On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 8:57 AM, Linus Torvalds
> <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> and will fall back to below 4g if it can not find any above 4g.
>>
>> Has this been tested on 32-bit machines without PAE? There might be
>> things that just happen to work because their allocations were always
>> done bottom-up.
>
> Good point. that problem should be addressed at first before this patch.
Just checked code for 32bit machines without PAE.
when X86_PAE is not set, phys_addr_t aka resource_size_t will be 32bit.
so in drivers/pci/bus.c::pci_bus_alloc_resource_fit()
will have bottom to 0.
resource_size_t bottom = PCIBIOS_MAX_MEM_32 + 1ULL;
also in arch/x86/kernel/setup.c::setup_arch()
iomem_resource.end = (1ULL << boot_cpu_data.x86_phys_bits) - 1;
will have iomem_resource.end to 0xffffffff
when X86_PAE is set, but CPU does not support PAE.
phys_addr_t aka resource_size_t will be 32bit.
so in drivers/pci/bus.c::pci_bus_alloc_resource_fit()
will have bottom to 4g.
resource_size_t bottom = PCIBIOS_MAX_MEM_32 + 1ULL;
but
in arch/x86/kernel/setup.c::setup_arch()
iomem_resource.end = (1ULL << boot_cpu_data.x86_phys_bits) - 1;
will have iomem_resource.end to 0xffffffff, because x86_phys_bits is 32 when PAE
is not detected in arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c::get_cpu_cap.
that mean first try will fail, so it will go to second try with bottom to 0.
so both case are safe with this patch.
Thanks
Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
