On 30.09.2013 18:25, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 08:47:10PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
>> On 25.09.2013 15:48, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 08:57:08AM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
>>>> On 23.09.2013 23:20, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 01:46:58PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> -static struct dev_pm_ops am35x_pm_ops = {
>>>>>> - .suspend = am35x_suspend,
>>>>>> - .resume = am35x_resume,
>>>>>> -};
>>>>>> +static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(am35x_pm_ops, am35x_suspend, am35x_resume);
>>>>>
>>>>> you could as well remove the DEV_PM_OPS trickery. Ditto for all other
>>>>> patches
>>>>
>>>> Yes, I noticed that too. That's why I sent out a v2 of the series :)
>>>
>>> Awesome :-) Thanks dude
>>
>> So are you happy with this v2?
>> It's just a cosmetic cleanup after all ...
>
> I can't see v2 anywhere... The only version I have is the one with
> DEV_PM_OPS still in it.
Ok, I'll resend them later.
Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
