On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 08:57:08AM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
> On 23.09.2013 23:20, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 01:46:58PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
>
> >> -static struct dev_pm_ops am35x_pm_ops = {
> >> - .suspend = am35x_suspend,
> >> - .resume = am35x_resume,
> >> -};
> >> +static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(am35x_pm_ops, am35x_suspend, am35x_resume);
> >
> > you could as well remove the DEV_PM_OPS trickery. Ditto for all other
> > patches
>
> Yes, I noticed that too. That's why I sent out a v2 of the series :)
Awesome :-) Thanks dude
--
balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
