Hi,
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 08:47:10PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
> On 25.09.2013 15:48, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 08:57:08AM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
> >> On 23.09.2013 23:20, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> >>> On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 01:46:58PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
> >>
> >>>> -static struct dev_pm_ops am35x_pm_ops = {
> >>>> - .suspend = am35x_suspend,
> >>>> - .resume = am35x_resume,
> >>>> -};
> >>>> +static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(am35x_pm_ops, am35x_suspend, am35x_resume);
> >>>
> >>> you could as well remove the DEV_PM_OPS trickery. Ditto for all other
> >>> patches
> >>
> >> Yes, I noticed that too. That's why I sent out a v2 of the series :)
> >
> > Awesome :-) Thanks dude
>
> So are you happy with this v2?
> It's just a cosmetic cleanup after all ...
I can't see v2 anywhere... The only version I have is the one with
DEV_PM_OPS still in it.
--
balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
