Tan, On 06/13/2013 06:01 AM, LF.Tan wrote: > Hi > I would like to add a new mailbox driver with this mailbox framework. > May I know this mailbox framework will available in kernel v3.10 or it > is pushed to v3.11? > > Thanks. This framework is dropped from v3.10 as this is being reworked and will be replaced with a different one that adds atomic context and tx callback support [1]. Jassi is working on a newer patchset currently for this, but you should be able to get started using [1]. regards Suman [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=136782509309470&w=2 > > On Friday 03 May 2013 15:39:42 Linus Walleij wrote: >> On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Arnd Bergmann <a...@xxxxxxxx > <mailto:a...@xxxxxxxx>> wrote: >> > On Thursday 02 May 2013 17:09:07 Suman Anna wrote: >> >> >> >> I do not know how much of an impact it is for the ST driver as the >> >> series adds the driver, and would have to wait until the RFC is sorted >> >> out otherwise. >> > >> > I think I'd prefer to drop the branch from the 3.10 queue then >> > and let you all work out a common approach for 3.11. Olof, any >> > other input? >> >> This will block all refactoring of the PRCMU driver, which Loic >> is working on, and also Ulf Hansson's clock driver. It is basically >> the key to breaking that driver apart and distributing it out into >> the proper subsystems. Loic has a big patch series for that >> for next merge window which will then have to be postponed, >> or queued on top of the mailbox work when finished. >> >> But maybe it's the right thing to do if the subsystem needs more >> work? I have no clear opinion on this, Loic, Ulf? > >> I think we can queue them together. I'm certainly fine with the >> mailbox subsystem getting merged through both the mfd and arm-soc >> trees to avoid conflicts. > >> Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
