On Friday 03 May 2013 15:39:42 Linus Walleij wrote: > On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thursday 02 May 2013 17:09:07 Suman Anna wrote: > >> > >> I do not know how much of an impact it is for the ST driver as the > >> series adds the driver, and would have to wait until the RFC is sorted > >> out otherwise. > > > > I think I'd prefer to drop the branch from the 3.10 queue then > > and let you all work out a common approach for 3.11. Olof, any > > other input? > > This will block all refactoring of the PRCMU driver, which Loic > is working on, and also Ulf Hansson's clock driver. It is basically > the key to breaking that driver apart and distributing it out into > the proper subsystems. Loic has a big patch series for that > for next merge window which will then have to be postponed, > or queued on top of the mailbox work when finished. > > But maybe it's the right thing to do if the subsystem needs more > work? I have no clear opinion on this, Loic, Ulf? I think we can queue them together. I'm certainly fine with the mailbox subsystem getting merged through both the mfd and arm-soc trees to avoid conflicts. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
