On 06/07/2013 05:44 PM, gg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On 2013-06-07 15:36, Mark Brown wrote:
On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 01:53:10PM +0300, Oleksandr Kozaruk wrote:
From: Graeme Gregory <gg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
The TWL6025 was never released beyond sample form and was replaced by
the PhoenixLite range of chips - TWL6032. Change the references to
reference the TWL6032 class and name the registers to twl6032 in
line with
an actual released chip name to avoid confusion.
Currently there is no users of TWL6025 in the code.
Given that the chip exists even if not widely distributed it seems as
well to keep the twl6025 references in there at least in the device ID
table - it won't do any harm to people using the twl6032 name and might
help someone who happens to pick up an old board for whatever reason.
I do not think any "old boards" exist, it really was a limited run!
Graeme
Hello Mark, Graeme,
Taking in account that:
- there is no hardware to test twl6025, testing is not possible;
- there is no documentation for twl6025, and if there are any changes to
twl6032 is not known;
- twl6032 is available, and in production, twl6025 is not even found on
ti.com
<https://emea.mail.ti.com/owa/redir.aspx?C=Lmz99OgekUScv9U89hUFHXTz_mebO9AIdxDOPBzqDKKuqB_Dr5dpU_Sl2criZoxOeMxW4IqmDOA.&URL=http%3a%2f%2fti.com>
So, what do you think, can this change be accepted?
// I apologize for sending previous email as personal, not to mail list.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
