On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 01:21:01PM +0300, Oleksandr Kozaruk wrote: > On 06/07/2013 05:44 PM, gg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > >On 2013-06-07 15:36, Mark Brown wrote: > >>On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 01:53:10PM +0300, Oleksandr Kozaruk wrote: > >>>From: Graeme Gregory <gg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>> > >>>The TWL6025 was never released beyond sample form and was replaced by > >>>the PhoenixLite range of chips - TWL6032. Change the references to > >>>reference the TWL6032 class and name the registers to twl6032 > >>>in line with > >>>an actual released chip name to avoid confusion. > >>> > >>>Currently there is no users of TWL6025 in the code. > >> > >>Given that the chip exists even if not widely distributed it seems as > >>well to keep the twl6025 references in there at least in the device ID > >>table - it won't do any harm to people using the twl6032 name and might > >>help someone who happens to pick up an old board for whatever reason. > > > >I do not think any "old boards" exist, it really was a limited run! > > > >Graeme > > > Hello Mark, Graeme, > > Taking in account that: > - there is no hardware to test twl6025, testing is not possible; > - there is no documentation for twl6025, and if there are any > changes to twl6032 is not known; > - twl6032 is available, and in production, twl6025 is not even found > on ti.com <http://ti.com> > > So, what do you think, can this change be accepted? > > // I apologize for sending personal e-mails, not to the mail list I have never seen a twl6025 board, it only ever existed AFAIK in lab samples which were used on a generic carrier board. twl6032 was the actual production device. Graeme -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
