On 06/13/2013 11:17 AM, Oleksandr Kozaruk wrote:
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 5:44 PM, <gg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:gg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>
> On 2013-06-07 15:36, Mark Brown wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 01:53:10PM +0300, Oleksandr Kozaruk wrote:
>>>
>>> From: Graeme Gregory <gg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:gg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
>>>
>>> The TWL6025 was never released beyond sample form and was replaced by
>>> the PhoenixLite range of chips - TWL6032. Change the references to
>>> reference the TWL6032 class and name the registers to twl6032 in
line with
>>> an actual released chip name to avoid confusion.
>>>
>>> Currently there is no users of TWL6025 in the code.
>>
>>
>> Given that the chip exists even if not widely distributed it seems as
>> well to keep the twl6025 references in there at least in the device ID
>> table - it won't do any harm to people using the twl6032 name and might
>> help someone who happens to pick up an old board for whatever reason.
>
>
> I do not think any "old boards" exist, it really was a limited run!
>
> Graeme
Hello Mark, Graeme,
Taking in account that:
- there is no hardware to test twl6025, testing is not possible;
- there is no documentation for twl6025, and if there are any changes
to twl6032 is not known;
- twl6032 is available, and in production, twl6025 is not even found
on ti.com <http://ti.com>
So, what do you think, can this change be accepted?
<http://www.globallogic.com/email_disclaimer.txt>
Sorry for spamming - had problems with mail server.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
