Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx> writes: > On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 5:15 PM, Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >>> Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx> writes: >> >> [...] >> >>>> Actually 2 things: >>>> >>>> a) patch seems to do the wrong thing for 4460 - 0x18 offset should >>>> have been used instead of 0x14 which is correct for 4430? >>> >>> I see, thanks. I'll double check the TRMs. >>> >>>> b) yes, I understand, the current settings we did worked, but the >>>> mode(0) we are setting to is real weird - we are setting it up for >>>> clk0 out - I cant even think why it is even working in the first place >>>> :( - is it because we are pumping out sysclkout and as a result we are >>>> lucky that msecure is being sampled at the right point by twl6030 >>>> allowing rtc access? either way, IMHO, the configuration is wrong. >>> >>> Ah, yes. Mode zero is definitely wrong. When I did the original patch >>> for legacy mode, I just duplicated the settings u-boot was using. Guess >>> it's a fluke that it works. >> >> Actually, for legacy mode, it's set correctly in mode 2. This line: >> >> omap_mux_init_signal("fref_clk0_out.sys_drm_msecure", OMAP_PIN_OUTPUT); >> >> does the right thing based on the signal name. But for DT boot, I >> defintely screwed it up by setting it to mode (and putting it in the >> wrong padconf section.) >> >> Also, are you *really* sure about the offset difference between 4430 and >> 4460 here? I don't have access to NDA docs anymore, so I cannot double >> check this. >> >> What I do know is that the legacy code is using 0x54 for both, and if I >> simply comment out that 'sys_drm_msecure' line above, RTC wake stops >> working (legacy boot) on both 4430 and 4460, so that seems like pretty >> stront evidence that it's the same offset on both. > Schematics are public for PandaBoard ES and PandaBoard - as you can > see from that the registers connected are definitely different. What I see from both schematics is that SYS_DRM_MSECURE is available on a few different pads, but on both 4430 and 4460, one of the places is in mode 2 of FREF_CLK0_OUT, which is at offset 0x54 on both SoCs. Based on that reading, and the fact that not correctly muxing that pad to mode 2 on *both* 4430 and 4460 makes the RTC work, I'm rather convinced that the offset should be the same for 4430 and 4460. What am I missing? Kevin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html