On 2/27/2012 11:17 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 6:52 AM, Cousson, Benoit<b-cousson@xxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Mark,
On 2/27/2012 2:41 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 06:01:20PM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
Depending on what order Mark happens to pull them in, I am fine
re-sending adding support for the 2 twl6030 fixed regulators.
Please can you guys come up with a single unified series for this stuff
- I'll hold off on applying anything to allow you to do this.
The issue is that the initial TWL regulator series from Rajendra will depend
on the twl core DT support I have that depends on the irq_domain series from
Grant...
If it depends on the irqdomain tree, then just merge that tree into
yours. That tree is stable now for exactly that reason. You can rely
on it.
I've just posted a pull request [1] to Tony that will merge your series
into an OMAP DT branch to be a base for further OMAP DT series.
Regards,
Benoit
[1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-omap/msg65346.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
