Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Device tree support for TWL regulators

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 6:52 AM, Cousson, Benoit <b-cousson@xxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
>
> On 2/27/2012 2:41 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 06:01:20PM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
>>
>>> Depending on what order Mark happens to pull them in, I am fine
>>> re-sending adding support for the 2 twl6030 fixed regulators.
>>
>>
>> Please can you guys come up with a single unified series for this stuff
>> - I'll hold off on applying anything to allow you to do this.
>
>
> The issue is that the initial TWL regulator series from Rajendra will depend
> on the twl core DT support I have that depends on the irq_domain series from
> Grant...

If it depends on the irqdomain tree, then just merge that tree into
yours.  That tree is stable now for exactly that reason.  You can rely
on it.

git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6 irqdomain/next

g.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux