On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 12:41 PM Andreas Kemnade <andreas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, 8 Nov 2018 09:06:37 -0800 > Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > * Andreas Kemnade <andreas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> [181106 21:37]: > > > Hi Tony, > > > > > > On Tue, 6 Nov 2018 12:39:14 -0800 > > > Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > * Andreas Kemnade <andreas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> [181106 20:24]: > > > > > Mainline kernel gives only about 100KByte/s, with sdio irqs I get > > > > > > 1000KByte/s. > > > > I have been following this thread which had me run some experiments of my own using a DM3730 and a WiFi chip with the SDIO interface. Can you tell me what you did to measure this performance difference? I'd like to run some tests on my hardware to see if the same applies to my boards too. thanks, adam > > > > That does not sound right at all. To me it sounds like the SDIO > > > > irq is not working at all during runtime for your SoC? Is that > > > > > > no wakeirq, no sdio irq: > Maybe this could be misunderstood: > If you do not specify a wakeirq, sdio irq handling is not enabled at all: > > > > ret = omap_hsmmc_configure_wake_irq(host); > > > if (!ret) > > > mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_SDIO_IRQ; > > > > We are using this here to have at least decent performance, low latency and reliable > 802.11 psmode (and therefore dramatically reduced power consumption of wifi module): > http://git.goldelico.com/?p=letux-kernel.git;a=blobdiff;f=drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c;h=bbfcef54b88cb534a49b1542e60c99e545a9e8a0;hp=68760d4a5d3da1a53c655d1b33f1c2237273d136;hb=44c8fc73ad8291c821855eaa88c13d5f9f2920f7;hpb=b48b43ee804e840de2e666873675d158b8219473 > > Regards, > Andreas
