* Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx> [160208 12:37]: > On Monday 08 February 2016 21:22:10 Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > > > I know, but how many users and developers are looking into git > > > > > *history* if they need to know what is missing in *current* > > > > > kernel? > > > > > > > > > > I think that removing board-rx51.c file would mean that table > > > > > is lost and everybody forget that this table needs to be > > > > > ported to nokia n900 DTS file. > > > > > > > > How about send a patch to copy those comments to board-n900.dts > > > > too? > > > > > > Ok, I'm fine with it. But I would like to see cpuidle omap support > > > in DT. > > > > Hmm but we're already using arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c > > to hit deeper idle states for DT based booting too? Or maybe > > you mean something else? > > And this is our problem. Nokia N900 needs different cpu idle parameters > as hardcoded in cpuidle34xx.c file. And because they are not in DT, but > in kernel source code, we cannot overwrite them from n900 DTS file. Oh. Can we set different parameters in omap3_idle_init() based on the soc_is_omap34xx()? You'd assume these parameters are SoC specific, not board specific? Regards, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
