On Monday 08 February 2016 21:22:10 Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > > I know, but how many users and developers are looking into git > > > > *history* if they need to know what is missing in *current* > > > > kernel? > > > > > > > > I think that removing board-rx51.c file would mean that table > > > > is lost and everybody forget that this table needs to be > > > > ported to nokia n900 DTS file. > > > > > > How about send a patch to copy those comments to board-n900.dts > > > too? > > > > Ok, I'm fine with it. But I would like to see cpuidle omap support > > in DT. > > Hmm but we're already using arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c > to hit deeper idle states for DT based booting too? Or maybe > you mean something else? And this is our problem. Nokia N900 needs different cpu idle parameters as hardcoded in cpuidle34xx.c file. And because they are not in DT, but in kernel source code, we cannot overwrite them from n900 DTS file. -- Pali Rohár pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
