* Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@xxxxxx> [160118 01:13]: > On Saturday 16 January 2016 01:11 AM, Suman Anna wrote: > > On 01/15/2016 01:22 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > >> I doubt this platform_data is dra7 specific. I believe it's > >> the same PCI controller that has been in the omap variants for > >> years? > > > > AFAIK, this only applies to DRA7. Sekhar/Kishon can confirm. I did take > > a quick look at OMAP3/4/5 TRMs, and didn't find any. Neither did a grep > > on current hwmod files other than DRA7. There's a DM81xx related PCI > > clock domain, but don't see any corresponding driver/device for the same. > > Like Suman, I do not know of any TI SoC that came off the OMAP mobile > business that has PCIe. > > DM81xx has a PCIe (but no mainline driver). Both DM81xx and DRA7x use a > designware core. But, the glue layer (which is the subject of interest > here), is completely different. I looked at the DM81xx driver in TI > kernel[1] to confirm this. OK thanks for checking. > I remember talking to Kishon about similarities between the DM81xx and > DRA7x PCIe subsystem and remember that he too mentioned that they are > quite different. OK > For an IP like PCIeSS, its quite difficult to come-up with unique names > without using the name of the platform they first appeared in. Anyway, > the driver is already called "pci-dra7xx", so I guess there is no harm > in having that name in platform data as well. That in itself should not > preclude its use on other platforms later (although I agree having a > generic name would be ideal). Yeah seems OK to me. I still have some PM runtime related questions though.. Will reply to the related patch chunk though. Regards, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
