On 09/30/2014 04:19 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote: > >> As just TI is using this out of band RAMINIT mechanism, should it be "ti,syscon" or just "syscon"? > > Yes, only TI uses this out-of-band RAMINIT (currently, at least). So, we > need an (optional) way to describe that. However, accessing syscon > registers in general is not TI specific and a generic way to do this > should be used. Which looks to me like the "syscon" property to allow > access to the register. Still, we should ask DT maintainers about it, > maybe they prefer a more precise property like "syscon-raminit" to allow > for further syscon extensions later or something... What do you think about putting the bit information in the syscon-raminit phandle as additional arguments? Marc -- Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | Industrial Linux Solutions | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 | Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
