> As just TI is using this out of band RAMINIT mechanism, should it be "ti,syscon" or just "syscon"? Yes, only TI uses this out-of-band RAMINIT (currently, at least). So, we need an (optional) way to describe that. However, accessing syscon registers in general is not TI specific and a generic way to do this should be used. Which looks to me like the "syscon" property to allow access to the register. Still, we should ask DT maintainers about it, maybe they prefer a more precise property like "syscon-raminit" to allow for further syscon extensions later or something...
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
