Re: OMAP1: mcbsp clocks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Jon.

So, if I understood correctly, the internal RAM you're talking about
is the one coming with the OMAP itself. Additionally, you could count
on the RAM coming with the board and the internal caches available,
right? Or are you using the term "internal RAM" to refer to the L1 /
L2 caches (if any)?

Regarding peripheral support, then this means that the driver support
should be basically the same among revisions, right?

Thanks for your reply. It has been really helpful.

Best regards,

Alex B.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Alejandro Blanca G. <alex.blanca@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 3:47 PM
Subject: Re: OMAP1: mcbsp clocks
To: "Hunter, Jon" <jon-hunter@xxxxxx>
Cc: "linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>


Hi Jon.

So, if I understood correctly, the internal RAM you're talking about
is the one coming with the OMAP itself. Additionally, you could count
on the RAM coming with the board and the internal caches available,
right? Or are you using the term "internal RAM" to refer to the L1 /
L2 caches (if any)?

Regarding peripheral support, then this means that the driver support
should be basically the same among revisions, right?

Thanks for your reply. It has been really helpful.

Best regards,

Alex B.

On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 3:29 PM, Hunter, Jon <jon-hunter@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Alejandro Blanca G wrote on :
>
> > First, I'm relatively new to the list and I'm still catching up with
> > the etiquette to follow. So, if I break it somehow, please do let me
> > know. It's not my intention to do so.
>
> No problem, but you may wish to post under a new subject, although I guess we did go off the main topic :-)
>
> > Now, I know that the OMAP16xx line of processors is composed (as far
> > as I know) by the following:
> >
> > * 1610
> > * 1611
> > * 1621
> > * 1623
> >
> > Does anybody know about the differences between them and / or about a
> > document explaining them?
>
> This is testing my memory now, but here is the way I recall it...
>
> OMAP1610 was the original device and to be honest all these devices have the same peripheral features.
>
> The OMAP1610 only has 16KB of internal RAM where as the other 3 (1611, 1621, 1623) all have 250KB of internal RAM.
>
> The OMAP1611 was rev'ed and a few improvements were made. Now from the user point of view not too many changes were made (ie. no new peripherals that I recall) but there were some new registers added in some modules. The OMAP1611 became the OMAP1621 after it was revised. So if you have a OMAP1611 this was the original device.
>
> The OMAP1623 is simply a OMAP1621 with stacked DDR memory.
>
> Hope this helps.
>
> Jon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux