* Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [090123 09:43]: > On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 05:17:28PM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > Basically we currently cannot use virtual clocks because of this > > and the fact that the parent of the virtual clock may not be known > > as pointed out by Paul Walmsley. > > One other thing I'd like to confirm is how the kernel treats the OMAP5912. > OMAP5912 is interesting to me at the moment because it seems that all > the information on it is freely available. I don't know about the > others. > > However, it would be useful to know how the kernel treats this - iow, > which of the four categories for OMAP1 SoCs - 310, 730, 1510, 1610. 5912 = 1611b = 16xx. Then 1710 is quite similar. > Of course, if someone knows (or can send me, maybe Richard W?) where > there's a similar document to spru751a for the clock architecture for > these other CPUs (and OMAP2420, OMAP2430, OMAP3430, etc) it would be > most useful. I have some links on my webpage to the docs: http://www.muru.com/linux/omap/ Still no public docs for 24xx :( Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
