Re: [PATCH 2/3] N810: Don't export camera orientation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 15/05/2008, Felipe Balbi <me@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 08:54:34AM +0200, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
>  > On 15/05/2008, Felipe Balbi <me@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>  > > On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 03:04:37PM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote:
>  > >  > ext Felipe Balbi wrote:
>  > >  >
>  > >  > Hello Felipe, and thanks for reviewing the patch! :)
>  > >  >
>  > >  >> On Tue, 13 May 2008 19:04:22 +0300, Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxx>
>  > >  >> wrote:
>  > >  >>> @@ -298,12 +340,21 @@ static int tcm825x_ifparm(struct v4l2_ifparm *p)
>  > >  >>>     return 0;
>  > >  >>>  }
>  > >  >>>
>  > >  >>> +static int tcm825x_is_upside_down(void)
>  > >  >>> +{
>  > >  >>> +   if (machine_is_nokia_n810())
>  > >  >>> +           return 1;
>  > >  >>> +
>  > >  >>> +   return 0;
>  > >  >>> +}
>  > >  >>> +
>  > >  >>>  const struct tcm825x_platform_data n800_tcm825x_platform_data = {
>  > >  >>> -   .is_okay      = tcm825x_is_okay,
>  > >  >>> -   .power_set    = tcm825x_power_set,
>  > >  >>> -   .default_regs = tcm825x_default_regs,
>  > >  >>> -   .needs_reset  = tcm825x_needs_reset,
>  > >  >>> -   .ifparm       = tcm825x_ifparm,
>  > >  >>> +   .is_okay        = tcm825x_is_okay,
>  > >  >>> +   .power_set      = tcm825x_power_set,
>  > >  >>> +   .default_regs   = tcm825x_default_regs,
>  > >  >>> +   .needs_reset    = tcm825x_needs_reset,
>  > >  >>> +   .ifparm         = tcm825x_ifparm,
>  > >  >>> +   .is_upside_down = tcm825x_is_upside_down,
>  > >  >>
>  > >  >> ok, now i got your point but this could be:
>  > >  >> .is_upside_down = machine_is_nokia_n810() ? 1 : 0,
>  > >  >
>  > >  > This doesn't work because machine_is_nokia_n810() is not constant.
>  > >  >
>  > >  > Anyway, tcm825x_is_upside_down can be made more simple as it could just
>  > >  > return machine_is_nokia_n810().
>  > >  >
>  > >  > I'll send new patches.
>  > >
>  > >  Didn't quite get, machine_is_nokia_n810() will always be true when
>  > >  running in n810. Could you clarify a bit :-p
>  >
>  > It'll *return* true, but C initialisers must be constants.  It simply
>  > wouldn't compile.
>
>
> and that's why i was using ?:
>
>
>  machine_is_nokia_n810 ? 1 : 0

This doesn't change anything - since machine_is_... is not constant,
the whole expression is not constant and is a syntax error.  The
compiler needs to know at compile time whether to store a 0 or a 1 in
the initialiser.
-- 
Please do not print this email unless absolutely necessary. Spread
environmental awareness.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux