On 15/05/2008, Felipe Balbi <me@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 03:04:37PM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > ext Felipe Balbi wrote:
> >
> > Hello Felipe, and thanks for reviewing the patch! :)
> >
> >> On Tue, 13 May 2008 19:04:22 +0300, Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> wrote:
> >>> @@ -298,12 +340,21 @@ static int tcm825x_ifparm(struct v4l2_ifparm *p)
> >>> return 0;
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> +static int tcm825x_is_upside_down(void)
> >>> +{
> >>> + if (machine_is_nokia_n810())
> >>> + return 1;
> >>> +
> >>> + return 0;
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> const struct tcm825x_platform_data n800_tcm825x_platform_data = {
> >>> - .is_okay = tcm825x_is_okay,
> >>> - .power_set = tcm825x_power_set,
> >>> - .default_regs = tcm825x_default_regs,
> >>> - .needs_reset = tcm825x_needs_reset,
> >>> - .ifparm = tcm825x_ifparm,
> >>> + .is_okay = tcm825x_is_okay,
> >>> + .power_set = tcm825x_power_set,
> >>> + .default_regs = tcm825x_default_regs,
> >>> + .needs_reset = tcm825x_needs_reset,
> >>> + .ifparm = tcm825x_ifparm,
> >>> + .is_upside_down = tcm825x_is_upside_down,
> >>
> >> ok, now i got your point but this could be:
> >> .is_upside_down = machine_is_nokia_n810() ? 1 : 0,
> >
> > This doesn't work because machine_is_nokia_n810() is not constant.
> >
> > Anyway, tcm825x_is_upside_down can be made more simple as it could just
> > return machine_is_nokia_n810().
> >
> > I'll send new patches.
>
> Didn't quite get, machine_is_nokia_n810() will always be true when
> running in n810. Could you clarify a bit :-p
It'll *return* true, but C initialisers must be constants. It simply
wouldn't compile.
Cheers
--
Please do not print this email unless absolutely necessary. Spread
environmental awareness.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
