On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 03:04:37PM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> ext Felipe Balbi wrote:
>
> Hello Felipe, and thanks for reviewing the patch! :)
>
>> On Tue, 13 May 2008 19:04:22 +0300, Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>> @@ -298,12 +340,21 @@ static int tcm825x_ifparm(struct v4l2_ifparm *p)
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>>
>>> +static int tcm825x_is_upside_down(void)
>>> +{
>>> + if (machine_is_nokia_n810())
>>> + return 1;
>>> +
>>> + return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> const struct tcm825x_platform_data n800_tcm825x_platform_data = {
>>> - .is_okay = tcm825x_is_okay,
>>> - .power_set = tcm825x_power_set,
>>> - .default_regs = tcm825x_default_regs,
>>> - .needs_reset = tcm825x_needs_reset,
>>> - .ifparm = tcm825x_ifparm,
>>> + .is_okay = tcm825x_is_okay,
>>> + .power_set = tcm825x_power_set,
>>> + .default_regs = tcm825x_default_regs,
>>> + .needs_reset = tcm825x_needs_reset,
>>> + .ifparm = tcm825x_ifparm,
>>> + .is_upside_down = tcm825x_is_upside_down,
>>
>> ok, now i got your point but this could be:
>> .is_upside_down = machine_is_nokia_n810() ? 1 : 0,
>
> This doesn't work because machine_is_nokia_n810() is not constant.
>
> Anyway, tcm825x_is_upside_down can be made more simple as it could just
> return machine_is_nokia_n810().
>
> I'll send new patches.
Didn't quite get, machine_is_nokia_n810() will always be true when
running in n810. Could you clarify a bit :-p
--
Best Regards,
Felipe Balbi
me@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://blog.felipebalbi.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
