Do you see any problems with just giving nilfs ->drop_inode() instance
like this:
int nilfs2_drop_inode(struct inode *inode)
{
if (unlikely(inode->i_ino == NILFS_ROOT_INO))
return true;
return generic_drop_inode(inode);
}
Then nilfs_root will live exactly until we unmount the damn thing, giving us
int nilfs_checkpoint_is_mounted(struct super_block *sb, __u64 cno)
{
struct the_nilfs *nilfs = sb->s_fs_info;
if (cno < 0 || cno > nilfs->ns_cno)
return false;
if (cno >= nilfs_last_cno(nilfs))
return true; /* protect recent checkpoints */
return nilfs_lookup_root(nilfs, cno) != NULL;
}
while the logics in nilfs_mount becoming simply
busy = d_count(s->s_root) > 1;
and we don't need to bother with nilfs_try_to_shrink_tree() at all.
I might be missing something, but it looks like that would work...
Comments?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nilfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
