Re: [RFC] simplifying the "is it mounted" checks for nilfs2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 11:03:09PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> Do you see any problems with just giving nilfs ->drop_inode() instance
> like this:
> int nilfs2_drop_inode(struct inode *inode)
> {
> 	if (unlikely(inode->i_ino == NILFS_ROOT_INO))
> 		return true;
> 	return generic_drop_inode(inode);
> }
> Then nilfs_root will live exactly until we unmount the damn thing, giving us

... except that it won't be enough ;-/  Nothing to kick dentries out
on such ummount of a secondary.  Oh, well...  I still doubt that
have_submounts() makes any sense there, but...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nilfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux CIFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux