On Wed, 26 Jan 2022, Bruce Fields wrote: > Frank added this test in 4299316fb357, and I don't really understand > his description, but it *sounds* like he really wanted it to do the > new-lockowner case. Frank? The way I read that commit message, there needs to be a second lock owner (as you suggest), but there clearly isn't one. Maybe there needs to be a second open_sequence() created ... I'm not sure. NeilBrown
