On Tue, Jun 01, 2021 at 04:01:08PM +0200, Petr Vorel wrote: > I've also find different failures on NFS 4.0: > > SEC7 st_secinfo.testRPCSEC_GSS : FAILURE > SECINFO returned mechanism list without RPCSEC_GSS That shouldn't be run by default; see patch, appended. > LOCK24 st_lock.testOpenUpgradeLock : FAILURE > OP_LOCK should return NFS4_OK, instead got > NFS4ERR_BAD_SEQID I suspect the server's actually OK here, but I need to look more closely. > They're on stable kernel 5.12.3-1-default (openSUSE). I saw them also on older > kernel 4.19.0-16-amd64 (Debian). > > Any idea how to find whether are these are wrong setup or test bugs or real > kernel bugs? For what it's worth, this is what I do as part of my regular regression tests, for 4.0: http://git.linux-nfs.org/?p=bfields/testd.git;a=blob;f=bin/do-pynfs;h=4ed0f7942b9ff0907cbd3bb0ec1643dad02758f5;hb=HEAD and for 4.1: http://git.linux-nfs.org/?p=bfields/testd.git;a=blob;f=bin/do-pynfs41;h=b3afc60dfab17aa5037d3f587d3d113bc772970e;hb=HEAD There are some known 4.0 failures that I skip: http://git.linux-nfs.org/?p=bfields/testd.git;a=blob;f=data/pynfs-skip;h=44256bb26e3fae86572e7c7057b1889652fa014b;hb=HEAD (But LOCK24 isn't on that list because I keep saying I'm going to triage it....) And for 4.1: http://git.linux-nfs.org/?p=bfields/testd.git;a=blob;f=data/pynfs41-skip;h=c682bed97742cf799b94364872c7575ac9fc188c;hb=HEAD --b. commit 98f4ce2e6418 Author: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue Jun 1 11:10:06 2021 -0400 nfs4.0 secinfo: auth_gss not required RPCSEC_GSS is mandatory to implement, but that doesn't mean every server will have it be configured on. I try to only add the "all" tag to tests whose failure indicates the server is really out of spec, or at least is very unusual and likely to cause problems for clients. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxx> diff --git a/nfs4.0/servertests/st_secinfo.py b/nfs4.0/servertests/st_secinfo.py index d9363de36969..4c4a44b3c919 100644 --- a/nfs4.0/servertests/st_secinfo.py +++ b/nfs4.0/servertests/st_secinfo.py @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ def testRPCSEC_GSS(t, env): per section 3.2.1.1 of RFC - FLAGS: secinfo all + FLAGS: secinfo gss DEPEND: SEC1 CODE: SEC7 """
