Re: [PATCH 1/2] Avoid reverse resolution for server name

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 09/04/13 15:22, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 03:12:56PM -0400, Steve Dickson wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 09/04/13 14:54, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
>>> Argh, no, one away or another the default needs to be to not do the PTR
>>> lookup.
>> Fine... 
>>  
>>>
>>> The transition Simo's using was Jeff's suggestion.  Let's just stick to
>>> that if we don't have a good reason.
>> Yeah... I would like to avoid adding to flags... I don't think both are 
>> needed.
> 
> So, no flags.
> 
>>> (But I don't have strong opinions about how to do it either.  I'd
>>> actually be OK with being harsh and just switching to the new behavior
>>> without any option.)
>> My crutch is I'm not a big DNS guy so I'm not sure how much breakage 
>> would occur... So I would rather be on the safe side and give people
>> a way to go back... 
> 
> So, yes to flags.  I'm confused!
Join the club! ;-)

> 
> I guess we can be moderately harsh: switch to the new default and
> provide only a flag to restore the old default for whoever wants it, but
> not a flag to specify the new default.  Is that what you mean?
Yes... This makes sense to me...

steved.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux