On 02/04/13 13:58, Myklebust, Trond wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: linux-nfs-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-nfs- >> owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Simo Sorce >> Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2013 1:49 PM >> To: Linux NFS Mailing list >> Subject: [PATCH 2/3] Avoid reverse resolution for server name >> >> A NFS client should be able to work properly even if the DNS Reverse record >> for the server is not set. There is no excuse to forcefully prevent that from >> working when it can. > > Note that rpc.statd has the same limitation. > >> This patch adds a new -N option that takes an 'on' or 'off' argument and >> controls whether forced PTR resolution is avoided (on) or performed (off) > > '-N' already has a very different meaning on rpc.mountd and rpc.nfsd. It might therefore be better to choose a different name to avoid confusion. > Also, why do a single option with an 'on/off' argument instead of just choosing 2 options ? Do we really what two options? why not just have something like -Z that will restore today default? steved. > > Trond > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
