Re: [PATCH 1/2] Avoid reverse resolution for server name

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 03:12:56PM -0400, Steve Dickson wrote:
> 
> 
> On 09/04/13 14:54, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > Argh, no, one away or another the default needs to be to not do the PTR
> > lookup.
> Fine... 
>  
> > 
> > The transition Simo's using was Jeff's suggestion.  Let's just stick to
> > that if we don't have a good reason.
> Yeah... I would like to avoid adding to flags... I don't think both are 
> needed.

So, no flags.

> > (But I don't have strong opinions about how to do it either.  I'd
> > actually be OK with being harsh and just switching to the new behavior
> > without any option.)
> My crutch is I'm not a big DNS guy so I'm not sure how much breakage 
> would occur... So I would rather be on the safe side and give people
> a way to go back... 

So, yes to flags.  I'm confused!

I guess we can be moderately harsh: switch to the new default and
provide only a flag to restore the old default for whoever wants it, but
not a flag to specify the new default.  Is that what you mean?

--b.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux