On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 11:47:13AM -0430, Robert Marcano wrote: > On 07/27/2011 11:17 AM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > >On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 10:13:44AM -0430, Robert Marcano wrote: > ... > >>Is this normal or a bug?, My interpretation is that even that the > >>mapping of the ACLs is not 100% perfect this simple example should > >>not be a problem. Is it impossible using NFS to create a shared > >>directory for a group of users? > > > >Without looking at your example carefully, it sounds like the same > >problem as discussed here: > > > > http://marc.info/?t=123739823200003&r=1&w=2 > > Thanks, exactly the same problem, current user umask getting in the > way of ACL inheritance, looks like the answers is that this is > currently not possible because the umask is applied client side and > the NFSv4 protocol does not help to send that info to the server. No > workaround available (mount option or something like that) I seem to recall there was a solution proposed in the above thread that Trond was OK with; if someone wants to read through it and implement that, I'm sure patches would be welcome.... --b. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html