Re: NFSv4 / POSIX ACL mapping bug?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 11:47:13AM -0430, Robert Marcano wrote:
> On 07/27/2011 11:17 AM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> >On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 10:13:44AM -0430, Robert Marcano wrote:
> ...
> >>Is this normal or a bug?, My interpretation is that even that the
> >>mapping of the ACLs is not 100% perfect this simple example should
> >>not be a problem. Is it impossible using NFS to create a shared
> >>directory for a group of users?
> >
> >Without looking at your example carefully, it sounds like the same
> >problem as discussed here:
> >
> >	http://marc.info/?t=123739823200003&r=1&w=2
> 
> Thanks, exactly the same problem, current user umask getting in the
> way of ACL inheritance, looks like the answers is that this is
> currently not possible because the umask is applied client side and
> the NFSv4 protocol does not help to send that info to the server. No
> workaround available (mount option or something like that)

I seem to recall there was a solution proposed in the above thread that
Trond was OK with; if someone wants to read through it and implement
that, I'm sure patches would be welcome....

--b.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux