Just because of this problem we're (still) using NFS3 with kerberos... On Wed, 2011-07-27 at 11:47 -0430, Robert Marcano wrote: > On 07/27/2011 11:17 AM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 10:13:44AM -0430, Robert Marcano wrote: > ... > >> Is this normal or a bug?, My interpretation is that even that the > >> mapping of the ACLs is not 100% perfect this simple example should > >> not be a problem. Is it impossible using NFS to create a shared > >> directory for a group of users? > > > > Without looking at your example carefully, it sounds like the same > > problem as discussed here: > > > > http://marc.info/?t=123739823200003&r=1&w=2 > > Thanks, exactly the same problem, current user umask getting in the way > of ACL inheritance, looks like the answers is that this is currently not > possible because the umask is applied client side and the NFSv4 protocol > does not help to send that info to the server. No workaround available > (mount option or something like that) > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
