On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 10:13:44AM -0430, Robert Marcano wrote: > Hi, This question is probably too simple for this nfs developer > list, but I am intrigued to know if this is a bug or not, I do not > find any other reference to anyone with this problem > > Ineed some help clarifying this issue in order to know if this is a > bug or limits of the NFSv4 / POSIX ACL mapping before reporting it > > Creating a directory on the server with the following POSIX ACLs, > rwx for the group "sharedgroup" and same defaults: > > ############################################################ > # file: directory > # owner: root > # group: root > user::rwx > group::r-x > group:sharedgroup:rwx > mask::rwx > other::--- > default:user::rwx > default:group::r-x > default:group:sharedgroup:rwx > default:mask::rwx > default:other::--- > ############################################################ > > Creating files with the same user with umask 022 on the server an on > the NFS client, the files do not get the same POSIX ACL mask: > > ############################################################ > # file: client > # owner: test > # group: testgroup > user::rw- > group::r-x #effective:r-- > group:sharedgroup:rwx #effective:r-- > mask::r-- > other::r-- > > # file: server > # owner: test > # group: testgroup > user::rw- > group::r-x #effective:r-- > group:sharedgroup:rwx #effective:rw- > mask::rw- > other::r-- > ############################################################ > > Is this normal or a bug?, My interpretation is that even that the > mapping of the ACLs is not 100% perfect this simple example should > not be a problem. Is it impossible using NFS to create a shared > directory for a group of users? Without looking at your example carefully, it sounds like the same problem as discussed here: http://marc.info/?t=123739823200003&r=1&w=2 --b. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
