Re: NFSv4 / POSIX ACL mapping bug?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/27/2011 11:17 AM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 10:13:44AM -0430, Robert Marcano wrote:
...
Is this normal or a bug?, My interpretation is that even that the
mapping of the ACLs is not 100% perfect this simple example should
not be a problem. Is it impossible using NFS to create a shared
directory for a group of users?

Without looking at your example carefully, it sounds like the same
problem as discussed here:

	http://marc.info/?t=123739823200003&r=1&w=2

Thanks, exactly the same problem, current user umask getting in the way of ACL inheritance, looks like the answers is that this is currently not possible because the umask is applied client side and the NFSv4 protocol does not help to send that info to the server. No workaround available (mount option or something like that)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux