On Fri, 29 Jul 2011, Trond Myklebust wrote:
On Fri, 2011-07-29 at 16:59 -0400, Justin Piszcz wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jul 2011, Bryan Schumaker wrote:
How does this look for printing out more information when a cookie loop is detected? Is there anything else that should be printed out? My patch applies on top of Trond's from yesterday.
Hi,
This fails against 2.6.38:
patching file fs/nfs/dir.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 134.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 173.
Hunk #3 FAILED at 323.
Hunk #4 FAILED at 336.
Hunk #5 FAILED at 349.
Hunk #6 succeeded at 320 (offset -48 lines).
Hunk #7 FAILED at 741.
Hunk #8 succeeded at 716 (offset -59 lines).
Hunk #9 succeeded at 749 (offset -59 lines).
Hunk #10 succeeded at 763 (offset -59 lines).
6 out of 10 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file fs/nfs/dir.c.rej
patching file include/linux/nfs_fs.h
Hunk #1 FAILED at 99.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/linux/nfs_fs.h.rej
atom:/usr/src/linux#
And the 3.0 kernel is broken for my wireless adapter:
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1411576
If you can make a combined patch for 2.6.38 I can try it, 2.6.39+ have a
horrible driver (rt2800usb) and 1 person emailed me as well stating the
same thing off-list (they stick with the manufacturer's driver or the *sta
one).
I don't understand. The readdir loop detection code was first merged
upstream in 2.6.39. 2.6.38 doesn't report any loops...
Hi,
Sorry--(my error) this is meant for the client, patched & will e-mail when
it happens again.
# patch -p1 < /home/jpiszcz/patch1
patching file fs/nfs/dir.c
patching file include/linux/nfs_fs.h
# patch -p1 < /home/jpiszcz/patch2
patching file fs/nfs/dir.c
(recompile->reboot->waiting for next error)
Justin.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
