On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 04:17:05PM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote: > I think the problem I have with this (besides the complexity) is that > if we must add more ways of avoiding NFSv4, then is NFSv4 really ready > to be made the default? Even given the best possible client and server implementation, there are enough user-visible not-completely-backwards-compatible changes in the protocol (ACLs, string names, etc.) that silently substituting v4 can't be the right thing for every case. --b. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
