On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 16:26 -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > > > (Merged now, so testing mainline as of today should work too.) > > > > The server isn't really a machine I want to test random kernels on, > is > > there some subset of those changesets which it would be useful for > me to > > pull back onto the 2.6.26 kernel I'm using to test? (I can most like > > manage the backporting myself). > > > > These two look like the relevant ones to me but I'm not sure: > > 22945e4a1c7454c97f5d8aee1ef526c83fef3223 svc: Clean up deferred > requests on transport destruction > > 69b6ba3712b796a66595cfaf0a5ab4dfe1cf964a SUNRPC: Ensure the server > closes sockets in a timely fashion > > > > I think 69b6 was in the set of three I tested previously and the > other > > two turned into 2294? > > Yep, exactly.--b. The client machine now has an uptime of ten days without error after these two patches were applied to the server. Thanks everybody, Ian. -- Ian Campbell I used to think that the brain was the most wonderful organ in my body. Then I realized who was telling me this. -- Emo Phillips
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
