Re: [PATCH 0/3] NFS regression in 2.6.26?, "task blocked for more than 120 seconds"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] NFS regression in 2.6.26?, "task blocked for more than 120 seconds"
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 17:21:15 -0500
Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-nfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Max Kellermann <mk@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, gcosta@xxxxxxxxxx, Grant Coady <grant_lkml@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Tom Tucker <tom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <1229452775.3721.25.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1227620339.9425.99.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1227621434.7057.33.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1227621877.9425.102.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1227737539.31008.2.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1228090631.7112.11.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1228169383.20370.3.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1228565812.10856.30.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1229279045.3721.1.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20081216175503.GG16388@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <1229452775.3721.25.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)

On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 06:39:35PM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> That's right, it was actually 2.6.26.7 FWIW.
> 
> > I'll try to take a look at these before I leave for the holidays,
> > assuming the versions Trond posted on Nov. 30 are the latest.
> 
> Thanks.

Sorry for getting behind.

If you got a chance to retest with the for-2.6.29 branch at

	git://linux-nfs.org/~bfields/linux.git for-2.6.29

that'd be great; that's what I intend to send to Linus.

--b.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 0/3] NFS regression in 2.6.26?, "task blocked for more than 120 seconds"
  - From: J. Bruce Fields

References:
- Re: [PATCH] NFS regression in 2.6.26?, "task blocked for more than 120 seconds"
  - From: Ian Campbell
- Re: [PATCH] NFS regression in 2.6.26?, "task blocked for more than 120 seconds"
  - From: Trond Myklebust
- Re: [PATCH] NFS regression in 2.6.26?, "task blocked for more than 120 seconds"
  - From: Ian Campbell
- Re: [PATCH] NFS regression in 2.6.26?, "task blocked for more than 120 seconds"
  - From: Ian Campbell
- Re: [PATCH 0/3] NFS regression in 2.6.26?, "task blocked for more than 120 seconds"
  - From: Trond Myklebust
- Re: [PATCH 0/3] NFS regression in 2.6.26?, "task blocked for more than 120 seconds"
  - From: Ian Campbell
- Re: [PATCH 0/3] NFS regression in 2.6.26?, "task blocked for more than 120 seconds"
  - From: Ian Campbell
- Re: [PATCH 0/3] NFS regression in 2.6.26?, "task blocked for more than 120 seconds"
  - From: Ian Campbell
- Re: [PATCH 0/3] NFS regression in 2.6.26?, "task blocked for more than 120 seconds"
  - From: J. Bruce Fields
- Re: [PATCH 0/3] NFS regression in 2.6.26?, "task blocked for more than 120 seconds"
  - From: Ian Campbell

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] svc: Clean up deferred requests on transport destruction
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] NFSD: FIDs need to take precedence over UUIDs
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/3] NFS regression in 2.6.26?, "task blocked for more than 120 seconds"
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/3] NFS regression in 2.6.26?, "task blocked for more than 120 seconds"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Filesystem Development] [Linux USB Development] [Linux Media Development] [Video for Linux] [Linux NILFS] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Info] [Linux SCSI]