On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 08:27:40AM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 16:26 -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > > > > > (Merged now, so testing mainline as of today should work too.) > > > > > > The server isn't really a machine I want to test random kernels on, > > is > > > there some subset of those changesets which it would be useful for > > me to > > > pull back onto the 2.6.26 kernel I'm using to test? (I can most like > > > manage the backporting myself). > > > > > > These two look like the relevant ones to me but I'm not sure: > > > 22945e4a1c7454c97f5d8aee1ef526c83fef3223 svc: Clean up deferred > > requests on transport destruction > > > 69b6ba3712b796a66595cfaf0a5ab4dfe1cf964a SUNRPC: Ensure the server > > closes sockets in a timely fashion > > > > > > I think 69b6 was in the set of three I tested previously and the > > other > > > two turned into 2294? > > > > Yep, exactly.--b. > > The client machine now has an uptime of ten days without error after > these two patches were applied to the server. > > Thanks everybody, Very good, so upstream should be OK. Thanks for the testing! --b. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
