On Aug 27, 2008, at Aug 27, 2008, 9:55 AM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 03:56:12PM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
On Aug 26, 2008, at Aug 26, 2008, 3:17 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 03:03:19PM -0400, bfields wrote:
It would be nice if not necessary just to move nfs_set_port()
somewhere
common and use that (maybe with a more generic name).
That aside, all 5 patches are OK by me.
Provisionally applied all but the first (purely client-side) patch
to
git://linux-nfs.org/~bfields/linux.git for-2.6.28
Do you have any good regression tests for nsm?
Netapp is providing some testing resources. Their lock recovery
tests
provide some test coverage, but I don't know details.
OK. If they've got it in a form that's easy to distribute and use I'd
like to be able to run something like that here to test some of my
work
in progress.
I believe it is still under development, and I don't know if they had
plans to package and support it outside of their Q/A team. I agree
that it would be useful for the community at large.
One of the issues on the list for the Austin bake-a-thon is to review
our test coverage, and see if we can flesh this out more.
I won't be able to make it to Austin but I'll be interested in
whatever
you find out.
No problem.
--
Chuck Lever
chuck[dot]lever[at]oracle[dot]com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
