On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 03:56:12PM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote: > On Aug 26, 2008, at Aug 26, 2008, 3:17 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 03:03:19PM -0400, bfields wrote: >>> It would be nice if not necessary just to move nfs_set_port() >>> somewhere >>> common and use that (maybe with a more generic name). >>> >>> That aside, all 5 patches are OK by me. >> >> Provisionally applied all but the first (purely client-side) patch to >> >> git://linux-nfs.org/~bfields/linux.git for-2.6.28 >> >> Do you have any good regression tests for nsm? > > Netapp is providing some testing resources. Their lock recovery tests > provide some test coverage, but I don't know details. OK. If they've got it in a form that's easy to distribute and use I'd like to be able to run something like that here to test some of my work in progress. > One of the issues on the list for the Austin bake-a-thon is to review > our test coverage, and see if we can flesh this out more. I won't be able to make it to Austin but I'll be interested in whatever you find out. --b. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
