On Aug 26, 2008, at Aug 26, 2008, 3:17 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 03:03:19PM -0400, bfields wrote:
It would be nice if not necessary just to move nfs_set_port()
somewhere
common and use that (maybe with a more generic name).
That aside, all 5 patches are OK by me.
Provisionally applied all but the first (purely client-side) patch to
git://linux-nfs.org/~bfields/linux.git for-2.6.28
Do you have any good regression tests for nsm?
Netapp is providing some testing resources. Their lock recovery tests
provide some test coverage, but I don't know details.
One of the issues on the list for the Austin bake-a-thon is to review
our test coverage, and see if we can flesh this out more.
--
Chuck Lever
chuck[dot]lever[at]oracle[dot]com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
