Re: [PATCH] regulator: rk808: make better use of the gpiod API

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2015-07-21 15:59 GMT+09:00 Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> The gpiod functions include variants for managed gpiod resources. Use it
> to simplify the remove function.
>
> As the driver handles a device node without a specification of dvs gpios
> just fine, additionally use the variant of gpiod_get exactly for this
> use case. This makes error checking more strict.
>
> As a third benefit this patch makes the driver use the flags parameter
> of gpiod_get* which will not be optional any more after 4.2 and so
> prevents a build failure when the respective gpiod commit is merged.
>
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Hello,
>
> this is the more complete fix of the issue that Stephen found while creating
> next-20150721 (see commit f51ec04cf8be9f7ef795f1f39ada17c19f725650).
>
> Best regards
> Uwe
>
>  drivers/regulator/rk808-regulator.c | 25 +++++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/rk808-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/rk808-regulator.c
> index ca913fd15598..3738e49beb75 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/rk808-regulator.c
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/rk808-regulator.c
> @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ static int rk808_buck1_2_get_voltage_sel_regmap(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
>         unsigned int val;
>         int ret;
>
> -       if (IS_ERR(gpio) || gpiod_get_value(gpio) == 0)
> +       if (!gpio || gpiod_get_value(gpio) == 0)
>                 return regulator_get_voltage_sel_regmap(rdev);
>
>         ret = regmap_read(rdev->regmap,
> @@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ static int rk808_buck1_2_set_voltage_sel(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
>         unsigned old_sel;
>         int ret, gpio_level;
>
> -       if (IS_ERR(gpio))
> +       if (!gpio)
>                 return rk808_buck1_2_i2c_set_voltage_sel(rdev, sel);
>
>         gpio_level = gpiod_get_value(gpio);
> @@ -205,7 +205,7 @@ static int rk808_buck1_2_set_voltage_time_sel(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
>         struct gpio_desc *gpio = pdata->dvs_gpio[id];
>
>         /* if there is no dvs1/2 pin, we don't need wait extra time here. */
> -       if (IS_ERR(gpio))
> +       if (!gpio)
>                 return 0;
>
>         return regulator_set_voltage_time_sel(rdev, old_selector, new_selector);
> @@ -540,14 +540,19 @@ static int rk808_regulator_dt_parse_pdata(struct device *dev,
>                 goto dt_parse_end;
>
>         for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(pdata->dvs_gpio); i++) {
> -               pdata->dvs_gpio[i] = gpiod_get_index(client_dev, "dvs", i);
> +               pdata->dvs_gpio[i] =
> +                       devm_gpiod_get_index_optional(client_dev, "dvs", i,
> +                                                     GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
>                 if (IS_ERR(pdata->dvs_gpio[i])) {
> +                       dev_err(dev, "failed to get dvs%d gpio\n", i);

Missing of_node_put() from of_get_child_by_name() called before.

> +                       return PTR_ERR(pdata->dvs_gpio[i]);
> +               }
> +
> +               if (!pdata->dvs_gpio[i]) {
>                         dev_warn(dev, "there is no dvs%d gpio\n", i);
>                         continue;
>                 }
>
> -               gpiod_direction_output(pdata->dvs_gpio[i], 0);
> -
>                 tmp = i ? RK808_DVS2_POL : RK808_DVS1_POL;
>                 ret = regmap_update_bits(map, RK808_IO_POL_REG, tmp,
>                                 gpiod_is_active_low(pdata->dvs_gpio[i]) ?
> @@ -561,14 +566,6 @@ dt_parse_end:
>
>  static int rk808_regulator_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
> -       struct rk808_regulator_data *pdata = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> -       int i;
> -
> -       for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(pdata->dvs_gpio); i++) {
> -               if (!IS_ERR(pdata->dvs_gpio[i]))
> -                       gpiod_put(pdata->dvs_gpio[i]);
> -       }
> -
>         return 0;
>  }

The function looks empty so it can be removed entirely.

Best regards,
Krzysztof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux