On 4/30/07, Quan Sun <cfk.quan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi, On 4/30/07, pradeep singh <2500.pradeep@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > heh... if a lot of disk I/O is required try changing the I/O scheduler too. > Make it CFQ, will help i guess.Read about Anticipatory and other IO > schedulers too. Though IMHO CFQ will be good enough. The problem is, my application is a heavy network socket IO proxy, and no disk IO involved. :)
heh... sorry thought Disk IO is also involved. But indeed a proxy(Squid if you are using, because i am just aware of squid only ;-) ) does make use of disk cache a lot than it appears. Isn't it? But somehow this doesnot fits well, i mean the scheduler thing. Can you try posting to the lkml too and let us know the responses? Thanks ~psr
-- Quan Sun
-- play the game - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
