On 4/30/07, Quan Sun <cfk.quan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi, On 4/30/07, pradeep singh <2500.pradeep@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > How did you reach to this conclusion? > Try 100Hz + CONFIG_PREEMPT.I hope you must have tried this? > Do you still face problem? Yes. I'm sure. > Is a lot of IO involved in your applications? Yes. It's a heavy IO load network proxy.
heh... if a lot of disk I/O is required try changing the I/O scheduler too. Make it CFQ, will help i guess.Read about Anticipatory and other IO schedulers too. Though IMHO CFQ will be good enough. HTH ~psr
-- Quan Sun
-- play the game - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
