On Thu, 04 Oct 2018 16:11:42 +0200 Janusz Krzysztofik <jmkrzyszt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Legacy nand_wait_ready() uses a hardcoded timeout value of 400 ms. Should we > follow the same approach in nand_gpio_waitrdy(), or should we rather let > drivers pass the timeout value, like in case of nand_soft_waitrdy()? The latter. ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
Re: [RFC PATCH] mtd: rawnand: ams-delta: use ->exec_op()
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] mtd: rawnand: ams-delta: use ->exec_op()
- From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2018 16:22:32 +0200
- Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-mtd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Brian Norris <computersforpeace@xxxxxxxxx>, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <38470936.GRFaOSl3cF@z50>
- References: <20180719081508.5dafebde@bbrezillon> <7546835.d2Xs8Qh0bZ@z50> <20181004155933.0a32c4ac@bbrezillon> <38470936.GRFaOSl3cF@z50>
- References:
- [RFC PATCH 0/8] mtd: rawnand: ams-delta: Use gpio-omap accessors for data I/O
- From: Boris Brezillon
- Re: [RFC PATCH] mtd: rawnand: ams-delta: use ->exec_op()
- From: Janusz Krzysztofik
- Re: [RFC PATCH] mtd: rawnand: ams-delta: use ->exec_op()
- From: Boris Brezillon
- Re: [RFC PATCH] mtd: rawnand: ams-delta: use ->exec_op()
- From: Janusz Krzysztofik
- [RFC PATCH 0/8] mtd: rawnand: ams-delta: Use gpio-omap accessors for data I/O
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC PATCH] mtd: rawnand: ams-delta: use ->exec_op()
- Next by Date: [PATCH v10 09/10] dt-binding: mtd: Document gpio-addr-flash
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC PATCH] mtd: rawnand: ams-delta: use ->exec_op()
- Next by thread: [PATCH v2 1/2] mtd: rawnand: Provide helper for polling GPIO R/B pin
- Index(es):
 |