On Thu, 04 Oct 2018 15:52:57 +0200 Janusz Krzysztofik <jmkrzyszt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Boris, > > On Wednesday, October 3, 2018 4:06:34 PM CEST Boris Brezillon wrote: > > On Wed, 03 Oct 2018 15:55:25 +0200 > > Janusz Krzysztofik <jmkrzyszt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Implementation of NAND_OP_WAITRDY_INSTR has been based on legacy > > > > > nand_wait_ready(), > > > > > > > > I don't remember what the ams-delta ->dev_ready()/->waitfunc() hooks > > > > are doing, but is shouldn't be too hard to replace them by an > > > > ams_delta_wait_ready() func. > > > > > > Default nand_wait() is used as ->waitfunc(), and ->dev_ready() returns R/B > > > GPIO pin status. > > > > Okay. Then it might make sense to provide a generic helper to poll a > > gpio. > > > > void nand_gpio_waitrdy(struct nand_chip *chip, struct gpio_desc *gpiod) > > { > > ... > > } > > How about a still more generic helper which accepts dev_ready() callback as an > argument? Nope, I still prefer the GPIO based one. We'll see if others need a a more generic helper, but I doubt it. ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/