On Wednesday, October 3, 2018 2:30:54 PM CEST Boris Brezillon wrote: > Hi Janusz, > > On Wed, 3 Oct 2018 14:00:28 +0200 > Janusz Krzysztofik <jmkrzyszt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Replace legacy callbacks with ->select_chip() and ->exec_op(). > > Thanks for working on that, that's really appreciated. > > > > > Implementation of NAND_OP_WAITRDY_INSTR has been based on legacy > > nand_wait_ready(), > > I don't remember what the ams-delta ->dev_ready()/->waitfunc() hooks > are doing, but is shouldn't be too hard to replace them by an > ams_delta_wait_ready() func. Default nand_wait() is used as ->waitfunc(), and ->dev_ready() returns R/B GPIO pin status. > > otherwise that function would probabaly have to be > > ^ probably Do you think other drivers which now provide ->dev_ready() won't require reimplementation of nand_wait_ready()? > > reimplemented inside the driver. Hence, legacy callback ->dev_ready() > > is still used. > > > > Use of IO_ADDR_R and IO_ADDR_W legacy structure members will be dropped > > later, as soon as the driver is converted to use GPIO API for data I/O. > > In the meantime, can you move the iomem pointer to the ams_delta > private struct so that this driver no longer uses the ->IO_ADDR_R/W > fields? OK > > > > Suggested-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <jmkrzyszt@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > Hi, > > > > I've not tested the change on hardware yet as I'm not sure if: > > - handling of NCE limited to that inside ->select_chip() is > > sufficient, > > I think it is. > > > - releasing ALE / CLE immediately after ams_delta_write_buf() is > > correct. > > Well, you should probably consider waiting for instr->ctx.delay_ns > nanoseconds after each instruction, but, if it was working before the > conversion to ->exec_op(), it should work just fine now. OK, I'll give it a try. Thanks, Janusz ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/