On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 06:31:53PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > On Wed, 19 Oct 2022 12:06:52 -0500, Dinh Nguyen wrote: > > Document the optional "altr,sysmgr-syscon" binding that is used to > > access the System Manager register that controls the SDMMC clock > > phase. > > > > Signed-off-by: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > v5: document reg shift > > v4: add else statement > > v3: document that the "altr,sysmgr-syscon" binding is only applicable to > > "altr,socfpga-dw-mshc" > > v2: document "altr,sysmgr-syscon" in the MMC section > > --- > > .../bindings/mmc/synopsys-dw-mshc.yaml | 32 +++++++++++++++++-- > > 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > Running 'make dtbs_check' with the schema in this patch gives the > following warnings. Consider if they are expected or the schema is > incorrect. These may not be new warnings. > > Note that it is not yet a requirement to have 0 warnings for dtbs_check. > This will change in the future. > > Full log is available here: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/ > > > dwmmc0@ff704000: $nodename:0: 'dwmmc0@ff704000' does not match '^mmc(@.*)?$' Not necessary for this series, but it would be nice if existing warnings were fixed before adding new things. Especially since most of the warnings on this common bindings are all socfpga. It may become required at some point, not just nice. The node name is the cause of most/all the unevaluated property warnings. > arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga_arria5_socdk.dtb > arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga_cyclone5_chameleon96.dtb > arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga_cyclone5_de0_nano_soc.dtb > arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga_cyclone5_mcvevk.dtb > arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga_cyclone5_socdk.dtb > arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga_cyclone5_sockit.dtb > arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga_cyclone5_socrates.dtb > arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga_cyclone5_sodia.dtb > arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga_cyclone5_vining_fpga.dtb > arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga_vt.dtb > > dwmmc0@ff704000: 'altr,sysmgr-syscon' is a required property > arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga_arria5_socdk.dtb > arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga_cyclone5_chameleon96.dtb > arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga_cyclone5_de0_nano_soc.dtb > arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga_cyclone5_mcvevk.dtb > arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga_cyclone5_socdk.dtb > arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga_cyclone5_sockit.dtb > arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga_cyclone5_socrates.dtb > arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga_cyclone5_sodia.dtb I thought it was optional? New required properties are a possible ABI break. Rob
