Hi Richard, (going back to the list. A few more eyes during the process will surely help :)) On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 06:26:05PM +0800, Zhu Richard-R65037 wrote: > I encounter some problems when I merge my eSDHC driver into > sdhci-pltfm.c driver. > In the eSDHC solution there is a little complex in the driver > implementation refer to the HW/IC design. > One private struct such as sdhci_fsl_host in my original codes is > needed, and the board specified platform data (such > as imxmmc_platform_data struct) is mandatory required too. > > sdhci-pltfm.c driver can't provide such kinds of APIs. > Do you have any suggestions? Well, I think we can do without. In a few minutes, I will post an RFC which I just hacked. Please have a look at it, and say if you have comments or suggestions. Hopefully you'll agree that this approach is a lot less intrusive. I will mainly concentrate on the driver. For the platform part, Uwe already gave a few comments. I will also reply to some of your patches to clarify some issues. Regards, Wolfram -- Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
